You are here: irt.org | RFCs | RFC8348 [ previous next ]
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) A. Bierman
Request for Comments: 8348 YumaWorks
Category: Standards Track M. Bjorklund
ISSN: 2070-1721 Tail-f Systems
J. Dong
Huawei Technologies
D. Romascanu
March 2018
A YANG Data Model for Hardware Management
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model for the management of
hardware on a single server.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8348.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................3 1.1. Terminology ................................................3 1.2. Tree Diagrams ..............................................3 2. Objectives ......................................................4 3. Hardware Data Model .............................................4 3.1. The Components Lists .......................................5 4. Relationship to ENTITY-MIB ......................................6 5. Relationship to ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB ...............................8 6. Relationship to ENTITY-STATE-MIB ................................8 7. Hardware YANG Modules ...........................................9 7.1. "ietf-hardware" Module .....................................9 7.2. "iana-hardware" Module ....................................34 8. IANA Considerations ............................................38 8.1. URI Registrations .........................................38 8.2. YANG Module Registrations .................................39 9. Security Considerations ........................................39 10. References ....................................................40 10.1. Normative References .....................................40 10.2. Informative References ...................................41 Appendix A. Hardware State Data Model ............................42 A.1. Hardware State YANG Module ................................43 Acknowledgments ...................................................60 Authors' Addresses ................................................60 Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 1. Introduction This document defines a YANG data model [RFC7950] for the management of hardware on a single server. The data model includes configuration and system state (status information and counters for the collection of statistics). The data model in this document is designed to be compliant with the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342]. For implementations that do not yet support NMDA, a temporary module with system state data only is defined in Appendix A. 1.1. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. The following terms are defined in [RFC8342] and are not redefined here: o client o server o configuration o system state o operational state o intended configuration 1.2. Tree Diagrams Tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined in [RFC8340]. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 2. Objectives This section describes some of the design objectives for the hardware data model. o The hardware data model needs to support many common properties used to identify hardware components. o Important information and states about hardware components need to be collected from devices that support the hardware data model. o The hardware data model should be suitable for new implementations to use as is. o The hardware data model defined in this document can be implemented on a system that also implements ENTITY-MIB; thus, the mapping between the hardware data model and ENTITY-MIB should be clear. o The data model should support pre-provisioning of hardware components. 3. Hardware Data Model This document defines the YANG module "ietf-hardware", which has the following structure: module: ietf-hardware +--rw hardware +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time +--rw component* [name] +--rw name string +--rw class identityref +--ro physical-index? int32 {entity-mib}? +--ro description? string +--rw parent? -> ../../component/name +--rw parent-rel-pos? int32 +--ro contains-child* -> ../../component/name +--ro hardware-rev? string +--ro firmware-rev? string +--ro software-rev? string +--ro serial-num? string +--ro mfg-name? string +--ro model-name? string +--rw alias? string +--rw asset-id? string +--ro is-fru? boolean +--ro mfg-date? yang:date-and-time Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 +--rw uri* inet:uri +--ro uuid? yang:uuid +--rw state {hardware-state}? | +--ro state-last-changed? yang:date-and-time | +--rw admin-state? admin-state | +--ro oper-state? oper-state | +--ro usage-state? usage-state | +--ro alarm-state? alarm-state | +--ro standby-state? standby-state +--ro sensor-data {hardware-sensor}? +--ro value? sensor-value +--ro value-type? sensor-value-type +--ro value-scale? sensor-value-scale +--ro value-precision? sensor-value-precision +--ro oper-status? sensor-status +--ro units-display? string +--ro value-timestamp? yang:date-and-time +--ro value-update-rate? uint32 notifications: +---n hardware-state-change +---n hardware-state-oper-enabled {hardware-state}? | +--ro name? -> /hardware/component/name | +--ro admin-state? -> /hardware/component/state/admin-state | +--ro alarm-state? -> /hardware/component/state/alarm-state +---n hardware-state-oper-disabled {hardware-state}? +--ro name? -> /hardware/component/name +--ro admin-state? -> /hardware/component/state/admin-state +--ro alarm-state? -> /hardware/component/state/alarm-state 3.1. The Components Lists The data model for hardware presented in this document uses a flat list of components. Each component in the list is identified by its name. Furthermore, each component has a mandatory "class" leaf. The "iana-hardware" module defines YANG identities for the hardware types in the IANA-maintained "IANA-ENTITY-MIB" registry. The "class" leaf is a YANG identity that describes the type of the hardware. Vendors are encouraged to either directly use one of the common IANA-defined identities or derive a more specific identity from one of them. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 4. Relationship to ENTITY-MIB If the device implements the ENTITY-MIB [RFC6933], each entry in the "/hardware/component" list in the operational state is mapped to one EntPhysicalEntry. Objects that are writable in the MIB are mapped to "config true" nodes in the "/hardware/component" list, except entPhysicalSerialNum, which is writable in the MIB but "config false" in the YANG module. The "physical-index" leaf MUST contain the value of the corresponding entPhysicalEntry's entPhysicalIndex. The "class" leaf is mapped to both entPhysicalClass and entPhysicalVendorType. If the value of the "class" leaf is an identity that either is derived from or is one of the identities in the "iana-hardware" module, then entPhysicalClass contains the corresponding IANAPhysicalClass enumeration value. Otherwise, entPhysicalClass contains the IANAPhysicalClass value "other(1)". Vendors are encouraged to define an identity (derived from an identity in "iana-hardware" if possible) for each enterprise-specific registration identifier used for entPhysicalVendorType and use that identity for the "class" leaf. The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding objects in the ENTITY-MIB. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 +--------------------------------+----------------------------------+ | YANG data node in | ENTITY-MIB object | | /hardware/component | | +--------------------------------+----------------------------------+ | name | entPhysicalName | | class | entPhysicalClass | | | entPhysicalVendorType | | physical-index | entPhysicalIndex | | description | entPhysicalDescr | | parent | entPhysicalContainedIn | | parent-rel-pos | entPhysicalParentRelPos | | contains-child | entPhysicalChildIndex | | hardware-rev | entPhysicalHardwareRev | | firmware-rev | entPhysicalFirmwareRev | | software-rev | entPhysicalSoftwareRev | | serial-num | entPhysicalSerialNum | | mfg-name | entPhysicalMfgName | | model-name | entPhysicalModelName | | alias | entPhysicalAlias | | asset-id | entPhysicalAssetID | | is-fru | entPhysicalIsFRU | | mfg-date | entPhysicalMfgDate | | uri | entPhysicalUris | | uuid | entPhysicalUUID | +--------------------------------+----------------------------------+ YANG Data Nodes and Related ENTITY-MIB Objects Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 5. Relationship to ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB If the device implements the ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB [RFC3433], each entry in the "/hardware/component" list where the container "sensor-data" exists is mapped to one EntPhySensorEntry. The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding objects in the ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB. +-------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | YANG data node in | ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB object | | /hardware/component/sensor-data | | +-------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ | value | entPhySensorValue | | value-type | entPhySensorType | | value-scale | entPhySensorScale | | value-precision | entPhySensorPrecision | | oper-status | entPhySensorOperStatus | | units-display | entPhySensorUnitsDisplay | | value-timestamp | entPhySensorValueTimeStamp | | value-update-rate | entPhySensorValueUpdateRate | +-------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ YANG Data Nodes and Related ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB Objects 6. Relationship to ENTITY-STATE-MIB If the device implements the ENTITY-STATE-MIB [RFC4268], each entry in the "/hardware/component" list where the container "state" exists is mapped to one EntStateEntry. The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding objects in the ENTITY-STATE-MIB. +------------------------------------------+------------------------+ | YANG data node in | ENTITY-STATE-MIB | | /hardware/component/state | object | +------------------------------------------+------------------------+ | state-last-changed | entStateLastChanged | | admin-state | entStateAdmin | | oper-state | entStateOper | | usage-state | entStateUsage | | alarm-state | entStateAlarm | | standby-state | entStateStandby | +------------------------------------------+------------------------+ YANG Data Nodes and Related ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB Objects Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 7. Hardware YANG Modules 7.1. "ietf-hardware" Module This YANG module imports typedefs from [RFC6991]. <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-hardware@2018-03-13.yang" module ietf-hardware { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-hardware"; prefix hw; import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; } import ietf-yang-types { prefix yang; } import iana-hardware { prefix ianahw; } organization "IETF NETMOD (Network Modeling) Working Group"; contact "WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netmod/> WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> Editor: Andy Bierman <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com> Editor: Martin Bjorklund <mailto:mbj@tail-f.com> Editor: Jie Dong <mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com> Editor: Dan Romascanu <mailto:dromasca@gmail.com>"; description "This module contains a collection of YANG definitions for managing hardware. This data model is designed for the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in RFC 8342. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8348; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2018-03-13 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC 8348: A YANG Data Model for Hardware Management"; } /* * Features */ feature entity-mib { description "This feature indicates that the device implements the ENTITY-MIB."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4)"; } feature hardware-state { description "Indicates that ENTITY-STATE-MIB objects are supported"; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB"; } feature hardware-sensor { description "Indicates that ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB objects are supported"; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base"; } /* * Typedefs Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 */ typedef admin-state { type enumeration { enum unknown { value 1; description "The resource is unable to report administrative state."; } enum locked { value 2; description "The resource is administratively prohibited from use."; } enum shutting-down { value 3; description "The resource usage is administratively limited to current instances of use."; } enum unlocked { value 4; description "The resource is not administratively prohibited from use."; } } description "Represents the various possible administrative states."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - EntityAdminState"; } typedef oper-state { type enumeration { enum unknown { value 1; description "The resource is unable to report its operational state."; } enum disabled { value 2; description "The resource is totally inoperable."; } enum enabled { value 3; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "The resource is partially or fully operable."; } enum testing { value 4; description "The resource is currently being tested and cannot therefore report whether or not it is operational."; } } description "Represents the possible values of operational states."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - EntityOperState"; } typedef usage-state { type enumeration { enum unknown { value 1; description "The resource is unable to report usage state."; } enum idle { value 2; description "The resource is servicing no users."; } enum active { value 3; description "The resource is currently in use, and it has sufficient spare capacity to provide for additional users."; } enum busy { value 4; description "The resource is currently in use, but it currently has no spare capacity to provide for additional users."; } } description "Represents the possible values of usage states."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - EntityUsageState"; } typedef alarm-state { Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 type bits { bit unknown { position 0; description "The resource is unable to report alarm state."; } bit under-repair { position 1; description "The resource is currently being repaired, which, depending on the implementation, may make the other values in this bit string not meaningful."; } bit critical { position 2; description "One or more critical alarms are active against the resource."; } bit major { position 3; description "One or more major alarms are active against the resource."; } bit minor { position 4; description "One or more minor alarms are active against the resource."; } bit warning { position 5; description "One or more warning alarms are active against the resource."; } bit indeterminate { position 6; description "One or more alarms of whose perceived severity cannot be determined are active against this resource."; } } description "Represents the possible values of alarm states. An alarm is a persistent indication of an error or warning condition. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 When no bits of this attribute are set, then no active alarms are known against this component and it is not under repair."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - EntityAlarmStatus"; } typedef standby-state { type enumeration { enum unknown { value 1; description "The resource is unable to report standby state."; } enum hot-standby { value 2; description "The resource is not providing service, but it will be immediately able to take over the role of the resource to be backed up, without the need for initialization activity, and will contain the same information as the resource to be backed up."; } enum cold-standby { value 3; description "The resource is to back up another resource, but it will not be immediately able to take over the role of a resource to be backed up and will require some initialization activity."; } enum providing-service { value 4; description "The resource is providing service."; } } description "Represents the possible values of standby states."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - EntityStandbyStatus"; } typedef sensor-value-type { type enumeration { enum other { value 1; description "A measure other than those listed below."; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 } enum unknown { value 2; description "An unknown measurement or arbitrary, relative numbers"; } enum volts-AC { value 3; description "A measure of electric potential (alternating current)."; } enum volts-DC { value 4; description "A measure of electric potential (direct current)."; } enum amperes { value 5; description "A measure of electric current."; } enum watts { value 6; description "A measure of power."; } enum hertz { value 7; description "A measure of frequency."; } enum celsius { value 8; description "A measure of temperature."; } enum percent-RH { value 9; description "A measure of percent relative humidity."; } enum rpm { value 10; description "A measure of shaft revolutions per minute."; } enum cmm { value 11; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "A measure of cubic meters per minute (airflow)."; } enum truth-value { value 12; description "Value is one of 1 (true) or 2 (false)"; } } description "A node using this data type represents the sensor measurement data type associated with a physical sensor value. The actual data units are determined by examining a node of this type together with the associated sensor-value-scale node. A node of this type SHOULD be defined together with nodes of type sensor-value-scale and type sensor-value-precision. These three types are used to identify the semantics of a node of type sensor-value."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - EntitySensorDataType"; } typedef sensor-value-scale { type enumeration { enum yocto { value 1; description "Data scaling factor of 10^-24."; } enum zepto { value 2; description "Data scaling factor of 10^-21."; } enum atto { value 3; description "Data scaling factor of 10^-18."; } enum femto { value 4; description "Data scaling factor of 10^-15."; } enum pico { value 5; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "Data scaling factor of 10^-12."; } enum nano { value 6; description "Data scaling factor of 10^-9."; } enum micro { value 7; description "Data scaling factor of 10^-6."; } enum milli { value 8; description "Data scaling factor of 10^-3."; } enum units { value 9; description "Data scaling factor of 10^0."; } enum kilo { value 10; description "Data scaling factor of 10^3."; } enum mega { value 11; description "Data scaling factor of 10^6."; } enum giga { value 12; description "Data scaling factor of 10^9."; } enum tera { value 13; description "Data scaling factor of 10^12."; } enum peta { value 14; description "Data scaling factor of 10^15."; } Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 enum exa { value 15; description "Data scaling factor of 10^18."; } enum zetta { value 16; description "Data scaling factor of 10^21."; } enum yotta { value 17; description "Data scaling factor of 10^24."; } } description "A node using this data type represents a data scaling factor, represented with an International System of Units (SI) prefix. The actual data units are determined by examining a node of this type together with the associated sensor-value-type. A node of this type SHOULD be defined together with nodes of type sensor-value-type and type sensor-value-precision. Together, associated nodes of these three types are used to identify the semantics of a node of type sensor-value."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - EntitySensorDataScale"; } typedef sensor-value-precision { type int8 { range "-8 .. 9"; } description "A node using this data type represents a sensor value precision range. A node of this type SHOULD be defined together with nodes of type sensor-value-type and type sensor-value-scale. Together, associated nodes of these three types are used to identify the semantics of a node of type sensor-value. If a node of this type contains a value in the range 1 to 9, it represents the number of decimal places in the fractional part of an associated sensor-value fixed-point number. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 If a node of this type contains a value in the range -8 to -1, it represents the number of accurate digits in the associated sensor-value fixed-point number. The value zero indicates the associated sensor-value node is not a fixed-point number. Server implementers must choose a value for the associated sensor-value-precision node so that the precision and accuracy of the associated sensor-value node is correctly indicated. For example, a component representing a temperature sensor that can measure 0 to 100 degrees C in 0.1 degree increments, +/- 0.05 degrees, would have a sensor-value-precision value of '1', a sensor-value-scale value of 'units', and a sensor-value ranging from '0' to '1000'. The sensor-value would be interpreted as 'degrees C * 10'."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - EntitySensorPrecision"; } typedef sensor-value { type int32 { range "-1000000000 .. 1000000000"; } description "A node using this data type represents a sensor value. A node of this type SHOULD be defined together with nodes of type sensor-value-type, type sensor-value-scale, and type sensor-value-precision. Together, associated nodes of those three types are used to identify the semantics of a node of this data type. The semantics of a node using this data type are determined by the value of the associated sensor-value-type node. If the associated sensor-value-type node is equal to 'voltsAC', 'voltsDC', 'amperes', 'watts', 'hertz', 'celsius', or 'cmm', then a node of this type MUST contain a fixed-point number ranging from -999,999,999 to +999,999,999. The value -1000000000 indicates an underflow error. The value +1000000000 indicates an overflow error. The sensor-value-precision indicates how many fractional digits are represented in the associated sensor-value node. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 If the associated sensor-value-type node is equal to 'percentRH', then a node of this type MUST contain a number ranging from 0 to 100. If the associated sensor-value-type node is equal to 'rpm', then a node of this type MUST contain a number ranging from -999,999,999 to +999,999,999. If the associated sensor-value-type node is equal to 'truth-value', then a node of this type MUST contain either the value 1 (true) or the value 2 (false). If the associated sensor-value-type node is equal to 'other' or 'unknown', then a node of this type MUST contain a number ranging from -1000000000 to 1000000000."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - EntitySensorValue"; } typedef sensor-status { type enumeration { enum ok { value 1; description "Indicates that the server can obtain the sensor value."; } enum unavailable { value 2; description "Indicates that the server presently cannot obtain the sensor value."; } enum nonoperational { value 3; description "Indicates that the server believes the sensor is broken. The sensor could have a hard failure (disconnected wire) or a soft failure such as out-of-range, jittery, or wildly fluctuating readings."; } } description "A node using this data type represents the operational status of a physical sensor."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - EntitySensorStatus"; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 } /* * Data nodes */ container hardware { description "Data nodes representing components. If the server supports configuration of hardware components, then this data model is instantiated in the configuration datastores supported by the server. The leaf-list 'datastore' for the module 'ietf-hardware' in the YANG library provides this information."; leaf last-change { type yang:date-and-time; config false; description "The time the '/hardware/component' list changed in the operational state."; } list component { key name; description "List of components. When the server detects a new hardware component, it initializes a list entry in the operational state. If the server does not support configuration of hardware components, list entries in the operational state are initialized with values for all nodes as detected by the implementation. Otherwise, this procedure is followed: 1. If there is an entry in the '/hardware/component' list in the intended configuration with values for the nodes 'class', 'parent', and 'parent-rel-pos' that are equal to the detected values, then the list entry in the operational state is initialized with the configured values, including the 'name'. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 2. Otherwise (i.e., there is no matching configuration entry), the list entry in the operational state is initialized with values for all nodes as detected by the implementation. If the '/hardware/component' list in the intended configuration is modified, then the system MUST behave as if it re-initializes itself and follow the procedure in (1)."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalEntry"; leaf name { type string; description "The name assigned to this component. This name is not required to be the same as entPhysicalName."; } leaf class { type identityref { base ianahw:hardware-class; } mandatory true; description "An indication of the general hardware type of the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalClass"; } leaf physical-index { if-feature entity-mib; type int32 { range "1..2147483647"; } config false; description "The entPhysicalIndex for the entPhysicalEntry represented by this list entry."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalIndex"; } leaf description { type string; config false; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "A textual description of the component. This node should contain a string that identifies the manufacturer's name for the component and should be set to a distinct value for each version or model of the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalDescr"; } leaf parent { type leafref { path "../../component/name"; require-instance false; } description "The name of the component that physically contains this component. If this leaf is not instantiated, it indicates that this component is not contained in any other component. In the event that a physical component is contained by more than one physical component (e.g., double-wide modules), this node contains the name of one of these components. An implementation MUST use the same name every time this node is instantiated."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalContainedIn"; } leaf parent-rel-pos { type int32 { range "0 .. 2147483647"; } description "An indication of the relative position of this child component among all its sibling components. Sibling components are defined as components that: o share the same value of the 'parent' node and o share a common base identity for the 'class' node. Note that the last rule gives implementations flexibility in how components are numbered. For example, some implementations might have a single number series for all components derived from 'ianahw:port', while some others might have different number series for different Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 components with identities derived from 'ianahw:port' (for example, one for registered jack 45 (RJ45) and one for small form-factor pluggable (SFP))."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalParentRelPos"; } leaf-list contains-child { type leafref { path "../../component/name"; } config false; description "The name of the contained component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalChildIndex"; } leaf hardware-rev { type string; config false; description "The vendor-specific hardware revision string for the component. The preferred value is the hardware revision identifier actually printed on the component itself (if present)."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalHardwareRev"; } leaf firmware-rev { type string; config false; description "The vendor-specific firmware revision string for the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalFirmwareRev"; } leaf software-rev { type string; config false; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "The vendor-specific software revision string for the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalSoftwareRev"; } leaf serial-num { type string; config false; description "The vendor-specific serial number string for the component. The preferred value is the serial number string actually printed on the component itself (if present)."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalSerialNum"; } leaf mfg-name { type string; config false; description "The name of the manufacturer of this physical component. The preferred value is the manufacturer name string actually printed on the component itself (if present). Note that comparisons between instances of the 'model-name', 'firmware-rev', 'software-rev', and 'serial-num' nodes are only meaningful amongst components with the same value of 'mfg-name'. If the manufacturer name string associated with the physical component is unknown to the server, then this node is not instantiated."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalMfgName"; } leaf model-name { type string; config false; description "The vendor-specific model name identifier string associated with this physical component. The preferred value is the customer-visible part number, which may be printed on the component itself. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 If the model name string associated with the physical component is unknown to the server, then this node is not instantiated."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalModelName"; } leaf alias { type string; description "An 'alias' name for the component, as specified by a network manager, that provides a non-volatile 'handle' for the component. If no configured value exists, the server MAY set the value of this node to a locally unique value in the operational state. A server implementation MAY map this leaf to the entPhysicalAlias MIB object. Such an implementation needs to use some mechanism to handle the differences in size and characters allowed between this leaf and entPhysicalAlias. The definition of such a mechanism is outside the scope of this document."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalAlias"; } leaf asset-id { type string; description "This node is a user-assigned asset tracking identifier for the component. A server implementation MAY map this leaf to the entPhysicalAssetID MIB object. Such an implementation needs to use some mechanism to handle the differences in size and characters allowed between this leaf and entPhysicalAssetID. The definition of such a mechanism is outside the scope of this document."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalAssetID"; } leaf is-fru { type boolean; config false; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "This node indicates whether or not this component is considered a 'field-replaceable unit' by the vendor. If this node contains the value 'true', then this component identifies a field-replaceable unit. For all components that are permanently contained within a field-replaceable unit, the value 'false' should be returned for this node."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalIsFRU"; } leaf mfg-date { type yang:date-and-time; config false; description "The date of manufacturing of the managed component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalMfgDate"; } leaf-list uri { type inet:uri; description "This node contains identification information about the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalUris"; } leaf uuid { type yang:uuid; config false; description "A Universally Unique Identifier of the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalUUID"; } container state { if-feature hardware-state; description "State-related nodes"; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB"; leaf state-last-changed { type yang:date-and-time; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 config false; description "The date and time when the value of any of the admin-state, oper-state, usage-state, alarm-state, or standby-state changed for this component. If there has been no change since the last re-initialization of the local system, this node contains the date and time of local system initialization. If there has been no change since the component was added to the local system, this node contains the date and time of the insertion."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateLastChanged"; } leaf admin-state { type admin-state; description "The administrative state for this component. This node refers to a component's administrative permission to service both other components within its containment hierarchy as well other users of its services defined by means outside the scope of this module. Some components exhibit only a subset of the remaining administrative state values. Some components cannot be locked; hence, this node exhibits only the 'unlocked' state. Other components cannot be shut down gracefully; hence, this node does not exhibit the 'shutting-down' state."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateAdmin"; } leaf oper-state { type oper-state; config false; description "The operational state for this component. Note that this node does not follow the administrative state. An administrative state of 'down' does not predict an operational state of 'disabled'. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 Note that some implementations may not be able to accurately report oper-state while the admin-state node has a value other than 'unlocked'. In these cases, this node MUST have a value of 'unknown'."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateOper"; } leaf usage-state { type usage-state; config false; description "The usage state for this component. This node refers to a component's ability to service more components in a containment hierarchy. Some components will exhibit only a subset of the usage state values. Components that are unable to ever service any components within a containment hierarchy will always have a usage state of 'busy'. In some cases, a component will be able to support only one other component within its containment hierarchy and will therefore only exhibit values of 'idle' and 'busy'."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateUsage"; } leaf alarm-state { type alarm-state; config false; description "The alarm state for this component. It does not include the alarms raised on child components within its containment hierarchy."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateAlarm"; } leaf standby-state { type standby-state; config false; description "The standby state for this component. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 Some components will exhibit only a subset of the remaining standby state values. If this component cannot operate in a standby role, the value of this node will always be 'providing-service'."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateStandby"; } } container sensor-data { when 'derived-from-or-self(../class, "ianahw:sensor")' { description "Sensor data nodes present for any component of type 'sensor'"; } if-feature hardware-sensor; config false; description "Sensor-related nodes."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base"; leaf value { type sensor-value; description "The most recent measurement obtained by the server for this sensor. A client that periodically fetches this node should also fetch the nodes 'value-type', 'value-scale', and 'value-precision', since they may change when the value is changed."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorValue"; } leaf value-type { type sensor-value-type; description "The type of data units associated with the sensor value"; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorType"; } Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 leaf value-scale { type sensor-value-scale; description "The (power of 10) scaling factor associated with the sensor value"; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorScale"; } leaf value-precision { type sensor-value-precision; description "The number of decimal places of precision associated with the sensor value"; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorPrecision"; } leaf oper-status { type sensor-status; description "The operational status of the sensor."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorOperStatus"; } leaf units-display { type string; description "A textual description of the data units that should be used in the display of the sensor value."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorUnitsDisplay"; } leaf value-timestamp { type yang:date-and-time; description "The time the status and/or value of this sensor was last obtained by the server."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorValueTimeStamp"; } Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 leaf value-update-rate { type uint32; units "milliseconds"; description "An indication of the frequency that the server updates the associated 'value' node, represented in milliseconds. The value zero indicates: - the sensor value is updated on demand (e.g., when polled by the server for a get-request), - the sensor value is updated when the sensor value changes (event-driven), or - the server does not know the update rate."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorValueUpdateRate"; } } } } /* * Notifications */ notification hardware-state-change { description "A hardware-state-change notification is generated when the value of /hardware/last-change changes in the operational state."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entConfigChange"; } notification hardware-state-oper-enabled { if-feature hardware-state; description "A hardware-state-oper-enabled notification signifies that a component has transitioned into the 'enabled' state."; leaf name { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/name"; } Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "The name of the component that has transitioned into the 'enabled' state."; } leaf admin-state { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/state/admin-state"; } description "The administrative state for the component."; } leaf alarm-state { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/state/alarm-state"; } description "The alarm state for the component."; } reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateOperEnabled"; } notification hardware-state-oper-disabled { if-feature hardware-state; description "A hardware-state-oper-disabled notification signifies that a component has transitioned into the 'disabled' state."; leaf name { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/name"; } description "The name of the component that has transitioned into the 'disabled' state."; } leaf admin-state { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/state/admin-state"; } description "The administrative state for the component."; } leaf alarm-state { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/state/alarm-state"; } Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "The alarm state for the component."; } reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateOperDisabled"; } } <CODE ENDS> 7.2. "iana-hardware" Module <CODE BEGINS> file "iana-hardware@2018-03-13.yang" module iana-hardware { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-hardware"; prefix ianahw; organization "IANA"; contact " Internet Assigned Numbers Authority Postal: ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 United States of America Tel: +1 310 301 5800 E-Mail: iana@iana.org>"; description "IANA-defined identities for hardware class. The latest revision of this YANG module can be obtained from the IANA website. Requests for new values should be made to IANA via email (iana@iana.org). Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). The initial version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8348; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; reference "https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters"; revision 2018-03-13 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC 8348: A YANG Data Model for Hardware Management"; } /* * Identities */ identity hardware-class { description "This identity is the base for all hardware class identifiers."; } identity unknown { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is unknown to the server."; } identity chassis { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is an overall container for networking equipment. Any class of physical component, except a stack, may be contained within a chassis; a chassis may only be contained within a stack."; } identity backplane { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is some sort of device for aggregating and forwarding networking traffic, such as a shared backplane in a modular ethernet switch. Note Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 that an implementation may model a backplane as a single physical component, which is actually implemented as multiple discrete physical components (within a chassis or stack)."; } identity container { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is capable of containing one or more removable physical entities, possibly of different types. For example, each (empty or full) slot in a chassis will be modeled as a container. Note that all removable physical components should be modeled within a container component, such as field-replaceable modules, fans, or power supplies. Note that all known containers should be modeled by the agent, including empty containers."; } identity power-supply { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is a power-supplying component."; } identity fan { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is a fan or other heat-reduction component."; } identity sensor { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is some sort of sensor, such as a temperature sensor within a router chassis."; } identity module { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is some sort of self-contained sub-system. If a module component is removable, then it should be modeled within a container Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 component; otherwise, it should be modeled directly within another physical component (e.g., a chassis or another module)."; } identity port { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is some sort of networking port capable of receiving and/or transmitting networking traffic."; } identity stack { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is some sort of super-container (possibly virtual) intended to group together multiple chassis entities. A stack may be realized by a virtual cable, a real interconnect cable attached to multiple chassis, or multiple interconnect cables. A stack should not be modeled within any other physical components, but a stack may be contained within another stack. Only chassis components should be contained within a stack."; } identity cpu { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is some sort of central processing unit."; } identity energy-object { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is some sort of energy object, i.e., it is a piece of equipment that is part of or attached to a communications network that is monitored, it is controlled, or it aids in the management of another device for Energy Management."; } identity battery { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is some sort of battery."; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 } identity storage-drive { base ianahw:hardware-class; description "This identity is applicable if the hardware class is some sort of component with data storage capability as its main functionality, e.g., hard disk drive (HDD), solid-state device (SSD), solid-state hybrid drive (SSHD), object storage device (OSD), or other."; } } <CODE ENDS> 8. IANA Considerations This document defines the initial version of the IANA-maintained "iana-hardware" YANG module. The "iana-hardware" YANG module is intended to reflect the "IANA-ENTITY-MIB" MIB module so that if a new enumeration is added to the "IANAPhysicalClass" textual convention, the same class is added as an identity derived from "ianahw:hardware-class". When the "iana-hardware" YANG module is updated, a new "revision" statement must be added in front of the existing revision statements. 8.1. URI Registrations This document registers three URIs in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]. Per the format in RFC 3688, the following registrations have been made. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-hardware Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-hardware Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-hardware-state Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 8.2. YANG Module Registrations This document registers three YANG modules in the "YANG Module Names" registry [RFC6020]. name: iana-hardware namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-hardware prefix: ianahw reference: RFC 8348 name: ietf-hardware namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-hardware prefix: hw reference: RFC 8348 name: ietf-hardware-state namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-hardware-state prefix: hw-state reference: RFC 8348 9. Security Considerations The YANG modules specified in this document define a schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC5246]. The NETCONF access control model [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content. There are a number of data nodes defined in the YANG module "ietf-hardware" that are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability: /hardware/component/admin-state: Setting this node to 'locked' or 'shutting-down' can cause disruption of services ranging from those running on a port to those on an entire device, depending on the type of component. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 Some of the readable data nodes in these YANG modules may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability: /hardware/component: The leafs in this list expose information about the physical components in a device, which may be used to identify the vendor, model, version, and specific device-identification information of each system component. /hardware/component/sensor-data/value: This node may expose the values of particular physical sensors in a device. /hardware/component/state: Access to this node allows one to figure out what the active and standby resources in a device are. 10. References 10.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC3433] Bierman, A., Romascanu, D., and K. Norseth, "Entity Sensor Management Information Base", RFC 3433, DOI 10.17487/RFC3433, December 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3433>. [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>. [RFC4268] Chisholm, S. and D. Perkins, "Entity State MIB", RFC 4268, DOI 10.17487/RFC4268, November 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4268>. [RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>. [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>. [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>. [RFC6933] Bierman, A., Romascanu, D., Quittek, J., and M. Chandramouli, "Entity MIB (Version 4)", RFC 6933, DOI 10.17487/RFC6933, May 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6933>. [RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>. [RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>. [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>. [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. [RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>. [RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>. 10.2. Informative References [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 Appendix A. Hardware State Data Model This non-normative appendix contains a data model designed as a temporary solution for implementations that do not yet support the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in [RFC8342]. It has the following structure: module: ietf-hardware-state x--ro hardware x--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time x--ro component* [name] x--ro name string x--ro class identityref x--ro physical-index? int32 {entity-mib}? x--ro description? string x--ro parent? -> ../../component/name x--ro parent-rel-pos? int32 x--ro contains-child* -> ../../component/name x--ro hardware-rev? string x--ro firmware-rev? string x--ro software-rev? string x--ro serial-num? string x--ro mfg-name? string x--ro model-name? string x--ro alias? string x--ro asset-id? string x--ro is-fru? boolean x--ro mfg-date? yang:date-and-time x--ro uri* inet:uri x--ro uuid? yang:uuid x--ro state {hardware-state}? | x--ro state-last-changed? yang:date-and-time | x--ro admin-state? hw:admin-state | x--ro oper-state? hw:oper-state | x--ro usage-state? hw:usage-state | x--ro alarm-state? hw:alarm-state | x--ro standby-state? hw:standby-state x--ro sensor-data {hardware-sensor}? x--ro value? hw:sensor-value x--ro value-type? hw:sensor-value-type x--ro value-scale? hw:sensor-value-scale x--ro value-precision? hw:sensor-value-precision x--ro oper-status? hw:sensor-status x--ro units-display? string x--ro value-timestamp? yang:date-and-time x--ro value-update-rate? uint32 Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 42]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 notifications: x---n hardware-state-change x---n hardware-state-oper-enabled {hardware-state}? | x--ro name? -> /hardware/component/name | x--ro admin-state? -> /hardware/component/state/admin-state | x--ro alarm-state? -> /hardware/component/state/alarm-state x---n hardware-state-oper-disabled {hardware-state}? x--ro name? -> /hardware/component/name x--ro admin-state? -> /hardware/component/state/admin-state x--ro alarm-state? -> /hardware/component/state/alarm-state A.1. Hardware State YANG Module <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-hardware-state@2018-03-13.yang" module ietf-hardware-state { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-hardware-state"; prefix hw-state; import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; } import ietf-yang-types { prefix yang; } import iana-hardware { prefix ianahw; } import ietf-hardware { prefix hw; } organization "IETF NETMOD (Network Modeling) Working Group"; contact "WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netmod/> WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> Editor: Andy Bierman <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com> Editor: Martin Bjorklund <mailto:mbj@tail-f.com> Editor: Jie Dong <mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com> Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 43]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 Editor: Dan Romascanu <mailto:dromasca@gmail.com>"; description "This module contains a collection of YANG definitions for monitoring hardware. This data model is designed as a temporary solution for implementations that do not yet support the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in RFC 8342. Such an implementation cannot implement the module 'ietf-hardware' properly, since without NMDA support, it is not possible to distinguish between instances of nodes in the running configuration and operational states. The data model in this module is the same as the data model in 'ietf-hardware', except all nodes are marked as 'config false'. If a server that implements this module but doesn't support NMDA also supports configuration of hardware components, it SHOULD also implement the module 'ietf-hardware' in the configuration datastores. The corresponding state data is found in the '/hw-state:hardware' subtree. Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8348; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2018-03-13 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC 8348: A YANG Data Model for Hardware Management"; } /* * Features */ Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 44]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 feature entity-mib { status deprecated; description "This feature indicates that the device implements the ENTITY-MIB."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4)"; } feature hardware-state { status deprecated; description "Indicates that ENTITY-STATE-MIB objects are supported"; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB"; } feature hardware-sensor { status deprecated; description "Indicates that ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB objects are supported"; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base"; } /* * Data nodes */ container hardware { config false; status deprecated; description "Data nodes representing components."; leaf last-change { type yang:date-and-time; status deprecated; description "The time the '/hardware/component' list changed in the operational state."; } list component { key name; status deprecated; description "List of components. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 45]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 When the server detects a new hardware component, it initializes a list entry in the operational state. If the server does not support configuration of hardware components, list entries in the operational state are initialized with values for all nodes as detected by the implementation. Otherwise, this procedure is followed: 1. If there is an entry in the '/hardware/component' list in the intended configuration with values for the nodes 'class', 'parent', and 'parent-rel-pos' that are equal to the detected values, then: 1a. If the configured entry has a value for 'mfg-name' that is equal to the detected value or if the 'mfg-name' value cannot be detected, then the list entry in the operational state is initialized with the configured values for all configured nodes, including the 'name'. Otherwise, the list entry in the operational state is initialized with values for all nodes as detected by the implementation. The implementation may raise an alarm that informs about the 'mfg-name' mismatch condition. How this is done is outside the scope of this document. 1b. Otherwise (i.e., there is no matching configuration entry), the list entry in the operational state is initialized with values for all nodes as detected by the implementation. If the '/hardware/component' list in the intended configuration is modified, then the system MUST behave as if it re-initializes itself and follow the procedure in (1)."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalEntry"; leaf name { type string; status deprecated; description "The name assigned to this component. This name is not required to be the same as entPhysicalName."; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 46]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 } leaf class { type identityref { base ianahw:hardware-class; } mandatory true; status deprecated; description "An indication of the general hardware type of the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalClass"; } leaf physical-index { if-feature entity-mib; type int32 { range "1..2147483647"; } status deprecated; description "The entPhysicalIndex for the entPhysicalEntry represented by this list entry."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalIndex"; } leaf description { type string; status deprecated; description "A textual description of the component. This node should contain a string that identifies the manufacturer's name for the component and should be set to a distinct value for each version or model of the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalDescr"; } leaf parent { type leafref { path "../../component/name"; require-instance false; } status deprecated; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 47]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "The name of the component that physically contains this component. If this leaf is not instantiated, it indicates that this component is not contained in any other component. In the event that a physical component is contained by more than one physical component (e.g., double-wide modules), this node contains the name of one of these components. An implementation MUST use the same name every time this node is instantiated."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalContainedIn"; } leaf parent-rel-pos { type int32 { range "0 .. 2147483647"; } status deprecated; description "An indication of the relative position of this child component among all its sibling components. Sibling components are defined as components that: o share the same value of the 'parent' node and o share a common base identity for the 'class' node. Note that the last rule gives implementations flexibility in how components are numbered. For example, some implementations might have a single number series for all components derived from 'ianahw:port', while some others might have different number series for different components with identities derived from 'ianahw:port' (for example, one for RJ45 and one for SFP)."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalParentRelPos"; } leaf-list contains-child { type leafref { path "../../component/name"; } Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 48]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 status deprecated; description "The name of the contained component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalChildIndex"; } leaf hardware-rev { type string; status deprecated; description "The vendor-specific hardware revision string for the component. The preferred value is the hardware revision identifier actually printed on the component itself (if present)."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalHardwareRev"; } leaf firmware-rev { type string; status deprecated; description "The vendor-specific firmware revision string for the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalFirmwareRev"; } leaf software-rev { type string; status deprecated; description "The vendor-specific software revision string for the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalSoftwareRev"; } leaf serial-num { type string; status deprecated; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 49]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "The vendor-specific serial number string for the component. The preferred value is the serial number string actually printed on the component itself (if present)."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalSerialNum"; } leaf mfg-name { type string; status deprecated; description "The name of the manufacturer of this physical component. The preferred value is the manufacturer name string actually printed on the component itself (if present). Note that comparisons between instances of the 'model-name', 'firmware-rev', 'software-rev', and 'serial-num' nodes are only meaningful amongst components with the same value of 'mfg-name'. If the manufacturer name string associated with the physical component is unknown to the server, then this node is not instantiated."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalMfgName"; } leaf model-name { type string; status deprecated; description "The vendor-specific model name identifier string associated with this physical component. The preferred value is the customer-visible part number, which may be printed on the component itself. If the model name string associated with the physical component is unknown to the server, then this node is not instantiated."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalModelName"; } leaf alias { type string; status deprecated; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 50]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "An 'alias' name for the component, as specified by a network manager, that provides a non-volatile 'handle' for the component. If no configured value exists, the server MAY set the value of this node to a locally unique value in the operational state. A server implementation MAY map this leaf to the entPhysicalAlias MIB object. Such an implementation needs to use some mechanism to handle the differences in size and characters allowed between this leaf and entPhysicalAlias. The definition of such a mechanism is outside the scope of this document."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalAlias"; } leaf asset-id { type string; status deprecated; description "This node is a user-assigned asset tracking identifier for the component. A server implementation MAY map this leaf to the entPhysicalAssetID MIB object. Such an implementation needs to use some mechanism to handle the differences in size and characters allowed between this leaf and entPhysicalAssetID. The definition of such a mechanism is outside the scope of this document."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalAssetID"; } leaf is-fru { type boolean; status deprecated; description "This node indicates whether or not this component is considered a 'field-replaceable unit' by the vendor. If this node contains the value 'true', then this component identifies a field-replaceable unit. For all components that are permanently contained within a field-replaceable unit, the value 'false' should be returned for this node."; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 51]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalIsFRU"; } leaf mfg-date { type yang:date-and-time; status deprecated; description "The date of manufacturing of the managed component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalMfgDate"; } leaf-list uri { type inet:uri; status deprecated; description "This node contains identification information about the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalUris"; } leaf uuid { type yang:uuid; status deprecated; description "A Universally Unique Identifier of the component."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalUUID"; } container state { if-feature hardware-state; status deprecated; description "State-related nodes"; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB"; leaf state-last-changed { type yang:date-and-time; status deprecated; description "The date and time when the value of any of the admin-state, oper-state, usage-state, alarm-state, or standby-state changed for this component. Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 52]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 If there has been no change since the last re-initialization of the local system, this node contains the date and time of local system initialization. If there has been no change since the component was added to the local system, this node contains the date and time of the insertion."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateLastChanged"; } leaf admin-state { type hw:admin-state; status deprecated; description "The administrative state for this component. This node refers to a component's administrative permission to service both other components within its containment hierarchy as well as other users of its services defined by means outside the scope of this module. Some components exhibit only a subset of the remaining administrative state values. Some components cannot be locked; hence, this node exhibits only the 'unlocked' state. Other components cannot be shut down gracefully; hence, this node does not exhibit the 'shutting-down' state."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateAdmin"; } leaf oper-state { type hw:oper-state; status deprecated; description "The operational state for this component. Note that this node does not follow the administrative state. An administrative state of 'down' does not predict an operational state of 'disabled'. Note that some implementations may not be able to accurately report oper-state while the admin-state node has a value other than 'unlocked'. In these cases, this node MUST have a value of 'unknown'."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateOper"; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 53]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 } leaf usage-state { type hw:usage-state; status deprecated; description "The usage state for this component. This node refers to a component's ability to service more components in a containment hierarchy. Some components will exhibit only a subset of the usage state values. Components that are unable to ever service any components within a containment hierarchy will always have a usage state of 'busy'. In some cases, a component will be able to support only one other component within its containment hierarchy and will therefore only exhibit values of 'idle' and 'busy'."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateUsage"; } leaf alarm-state { type hw:alarm-state; status deprecated; description "The alarm state for this component. It does not include the alarms raised on child components within its containment hierarchy."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateAlarm"; } leaf standby-state { type hw:standby-state; status deprecated; description "The standby state for this component. Some components will exhibit only a subset of the remaining standby state values. If this component cannot operate in a standby role, the value of this node will always be 'providing-service'."; reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateStandby"; } } Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 54]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 container sensor-data { when 'derived-from-or-self(../class, "ianahw:sensor")' { description "Sensor data nodes present for any component of type 'sensor'"; } if-feature hardware-sensor; status deprecated; description "Sensor-related nodes."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base"; leaf value { type hw:sensor-value; status deprecated; description "The most recent measurement obtained by the server for this sensor. A client that periodically fetches this node should also fetch the nodes 'value-type', 'value-scale', and 'value-precision', since they may change when the value is changed."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorValue"; } leaf value-type { type hw:sensor-value-type; status deprecated; description "The type of data units associated with the sensor value"; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorType"; } leaf value-scale { type hw:sensor-value-scale; status deprecated; description "The (power of 10) scaling factor associated with the sensor value"; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 55]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorScale"; } leaf value-precision { type hw:sensor-value-precision; status deprecated; description "The number of decimal places of precision associated with the sensor value"; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorPrecision"; } leaf oper-status { type hw:sensor-status; status deprecated; description "The operational status of the sensor."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorOperStatus"; } leaf units-display { type string; status deprecated; description "A textual description of the data units that should be used in the display of the sensor value."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorUnitsDisplay"; } leaf value-timestamp { type yang:date-and-time; status deprecated; description "The time the status and/or value of this sensor was last obtained by the server."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorValueTimeStamp"; } Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 56]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 leaf value-update-rate { type uint32; units "milliseconds"; status deprecated; description "An indication of the frequency that the server updates the associated 'value' node, represented in milliseconds. The value zero indicates: - the sensor value is updated on demand (e.g., when polled by the server for a get-request), - the sensor value is updated when the sensor value changes (event-driven), or - the server does not know the update rate."; reference "RFC 3433: Entity Sensor Management Information Base - entPhySensorValueUpdateRate"; } } } } /* * Notifications */ notification hardware-state-change { status deprecated; description "A hardware-state-change notification is generated when the value of /hardware/last-change changes in the operational state."; reference "RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entConfigChange"; } notification hardware-state-oper-enabled { if-feature hardware-state; status deprecated; description "A hardware-state-oper-enabled notification signifies that a component has transitioned into the 'enabled' state."; leaf name { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/name"; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 57]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 } status deprecated; description "The name of the component that has transitioned into the 'enabled' state."; } leaf admin-state { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/state/admin-state"; } status deprecated; description "The administrative state for the component."; } leaf alarm-state { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/state/alarm-state"; } status deprecated; description "The alarm state for the component."; } reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateOperEnabled"; } notification hardware-state-oper-disabled { if-feature hardware-state; status deprecated; description "A hardware-state-oper-disabled notification signifies that a component has transitioned into the 'disabled' state."; leaf name { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/name"; } status deprecated; description "The name of the component that has transitioned into the 'disabled' state."; } leaf admin-state { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/state/admin-state"; } status deprecated; Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 58]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 description "The administrative state for the component."; } leaf alarm-state { type leafref { path "/hardware/component/state/alarm-state"; } status deprecated; description "The alarm state for the component."; } reference "RFC 4268: Entity State MIB - entStateOperDisabled"; } } <CODE ENDS> Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 59]
RFC 8348 YANG Hardware Management March 2018 Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank the following individuals, who all provided helpful comments on various draft versions of this document: Bart Bogaert, Timothy Carey, William Lupton, and Juergen Schoenwaelder. Authors' Addresses Andy Bierman YumaWorks Email: andy@yumaworks.com Martin Bjorklund Tail-f Systems Email: mbj@tail-f.com Jie Dong Huawei Technologies Email: jie.dong@huawei.com Dan Romascanu Email: dromasca@gmail.com Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 60]